Jesus baptised by John the Baptist by going all the way under the water and coming back up out of the water. Yet the name Baptist did not come from John the Baptist. We find co-operation of churches in the New Testament. Acts 8:14 reveals the church of Jerusalem co-operating in Samaria where Philip was preaching the gospel and souls were being saved and baptised. We find Peter going to the Gentiles and some circumcised believers were with him when he preached and souls were saved and Peter asked the circumcised believers from the church in Jerusalem if they would forbid the baptising of these believers. The church in Jerusalem sent Barnabas to the church in Antioch for the purpose of co-operation.
1. ASSOCIATION BAPTISTS, A.D. 33.
Examples of the co-operation and association that existed in these first century (A.D.) churches are found int the book of Acts and also referenced in II Cor. 8:19-23.
Co-operation with a minimum of inter-church organisation has characterised Association Baptists in history and no doubt accounts for so little being known of their associational work of the past, though no doubt such existed.
2. AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION, 1905.
This work began with the Baptist General Association, 1905, which was a perpetuation of associational principles practised by Baptists of many association through the centuries. The name was changed to American Baptist Association in 1925, when the Baptist Missionary Association of Texas came into this work.
3. AMERICAN BAPTIST CONVENTION, 1814.
Was organised as the Baptist General Convention and became known as the Triennial Convention. A split came in 1844 which resulted in the Southern Baptist Convention in 1845. Thus, those of the North came to be known as Northern Baptists. The Northern Baptist Conventions was adopted as the name of this group in 1907, and in 1950 they officially changed their name to the American Baptist Convention.
4. NORTH AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION, 1950.
This resulted from a split in the American Baptist Association. Several issues brought on the split. One was the matter of representation. The American Baptist Association had always left it to the representing church as to whom they would choose to represent them. Some sought to change this, and also sought to change the matter of voting to proxy voting by non-represented church. This had never been the practice of the ABA. Still another issue seemed to be the matter of Seminaries and schools. Some thought they should not be churched-owned, but owned by the Association.
5. SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION, 1845.
This was a split from the Triennial Convention over the slavery question. They held to all the evils of convention-ism: money basis of representation, boards to hire and fire missionaries, pressure programs, interference in local church affairs.
6. NATIONAL BAPTIST CONVENTION (AFRICAN-AMERICAN), 1880.
7. FREEWILL BAPTISTS, 1770, FOUNDED BY BENJAMIN RANDALL.
8. GENERAL BAPTISTS, 1714.
9. NATIONAL BAPTIST EVANGELICAL LIFE AND SOUL SAVING ASSEMBLY OF U.S.A., 1921.
10. NATIONAL PRIMITIVE BAPTIST CONVENTION OF THE U.S.A. (AFRICAN-AMERICAN), 1907
11. NORTH AMERICAN BAPTIST GENERAL CONFERENCE (GERMAN), 1860.
12. PRIMITIVE BAPTISTS (HARDSHELL), 1825-1832, FOUNDED BY PARKER.
Most of these have deviated from the truth of God’s Word to such a great extent that some would not be recognized as a Baptist church and others have lost their candlestick and can no longer be considered the “CHURCH THAT JESUS BUILT.” To be a true New Testament Church they must maintain the doctrines that Jesus, Paul and the Apostles delivered to the Churches.Technorati Tags: Jesus, Paul, apostles, churches, New, Testament, promitive, hardshell, general, assembly
Christianity Today Poll
Should Christians resist full body ‘nude’ scans and invasive pat-downs at the airport?
Yes, because it violates our civil liberties. – 24%
Yes, because the Bible calls us to modesty. – 10%
No, our country’s security is at stake. – 27%
No, I don’t know what the big deal is. – 28%
I don’t know. – 12%
Now I presume that those that read Christianity Today, would call themselves Christians. That leaves me with the thought that they maybe don’t understand what modesty truly consists of. I drift to the thought of personal licentiousness. Christianity today has no problem with exposing the body to leering looks from the opposite gender. Sinful desensitation has taken place and leering and lusting is no longer condemned. In fact there are those that seek this form of sensuality and attain the only value and worth that they possess from this.
Any “Christian” (so called) that does not object to these procedures do not deserve the title “Christian.” There is not one reason to subject a person to this degraded, satan inspired humiliation.
Technorati Tags: pat-down, x-ray, security, decency, christian, satan
Filed under Commentary
Tagged as airport, christian, decency, down, pat, poll, screening